This third week in our webskills class was the occasion to skim through the previous projects reports to see what has been achieved in terms of teaching through the webskills.
The Learners:
The target populations of the projects is various diverse. They range from k12 to post graduate students and in service professionals. Likewise the social and educational backgrounds of the students are diverse.
Below is a recaputilative table of the students target populations
Age group
|
Number
|
AGE in years
|
SCHOOLING
|
teen
|
24
|
15
– 16
|
Grade 9 technical
school
|
teen
|
30
|
12 -13
|
unspecified
|
adults
|
20
|
unspecified
|
master
|
Teens and Adults
|
80
|
17-24
|
Grade 13
|
adults
|
16
|
19-30
|
undergraduate
|
adults
|
22
|
unspecified
|
Graduate and post
graduate
|
adults
|
35
|
22-23
|
Master
|
Common aspects:
The classroom settings is one
common feature. Often, teachers who have worked on the project have
relatively acceptable numbers of students in the classes. It is far more acceptable compared to Senegalese settings.
Different aspects:
A major difference between the projects can be related to the type of learners needs. When young learners acquire basic level skills (reading, speaking, writing, listening, adults are seeking assistance are more learning for professional needs, hence; the orientation towards more general or meta skills like reseaching, teaching.
Issues raised in the projects:
The issues raised in learning include:
- improving grammar practice inside and outside the class (Linares, Honduras)
- building writing skills (Nikiema, Burkina Faso)
- building speaking and writing skills(zubel, poland)
- providing distance online support and capacity building for teachers (Reddy, South Africa)
- building students confident through task based communicative project (Niccolici, Poland)
- addressing multiple intelligences through web based actitives (Pagila, Romania)
- developing research and accademic writing skills (Phyak, Nepal)
After reading the reports, even though few have attempted to integrate the speaking skills in in terms of pronunciation at K12 in the project, it appears that most projects deal more with production reading or writing. This is to consolidate the view that teaching speaking through the web remains a major challenge.
Approaches:
Two tools that have been mostly used are blogging and webquests. Other options include emailing, google website, nicenet discussion,
Projects cycle:
NB: It's interesting to note that the material design and implementation process phases can be sometimes fuzzy as, some projects approached teaching from the "learning by doing" apporach. This made the the students part of the design and implementation process. The teacher is not the only creator.
Hi Abdouse,
ReplyDeleteWhat an interesting summary you prepared.
In the table there is no project intended for small learners, from 5 to 12, do you think it is all due the backgrounds or profiles of the teachers involved, or there is a lack of sites and previous knowledge on the small learners that make it difficult to carry out a project?
Luis
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Abdouse
ReplyDeleteI whole heartedly agree with Luis. Fantastic summary, great chart, and wonderful graphics.
If you could turn off word verification step 6 from our handout then it would make it easier for your readers to post to your blog.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O3ryxh6wCCcsWGrNc04uV54MrQ5DetMQLzXiCZv79K4/edit
Robert
Hi Robert and Luis.
ReplyDeleteThanks for bucking me up!
I have turned of the word verification.
Luis, I am not sure about the choice of the target population. May be they don't teach young learners. Surely, teaching young learner is more challenging. In my context for exmaple, they have little background in technology. Therefore, they require more preparation, more guidance.